It may never be truly understood what the real reasons are behind why people make decisions against the laws implemented for mankind’s protection.
Philosophy can only dig so deep to find these truths and the evolution of criminal behavior only expands with more knowledge of what works and what does not work.
Do most felons act rationally after weighing the costs of offense?
Is society of all time to fault for an person to perpetrate a offense?
Offenders are viewed as reason TABLE people with the same capacity for resisting offensive behaviors as non-offenders.
This guided the principal of innocent until proven guilty.
This relationship existed to forestall pandemonium. As a portion of this relationship persons gave up some of their autonomies in the involvement of the common good, with the intent of the jurisprudence being to guarantee that these common involvements were met.
For Beccaria, this meant that the jurisprudence should be limited and written down so that people could do determinations on how to act. t the offense non the person and was to be certain and Swift ( Williams & A ; Mc Shane, 2010 ) .
The entrap concern Of the law and the criminal justice process was therefore the prevention of crime through this deterrent function. The idea that criminal behavior is determined, or caused, by something, leads to the legal, social, and cultural factors that influence the decision to label some behaviors as criminal while others or not Like marijuana.
Although it comes from the earth in plant form its hallucinogenic effects and inability to tax makes it illegal in most stated to manufacture produce without medical and government clearance in the states that have adopted the drug as legal.